10% Discount on Forex Tester 2 - CLICK HERE
 

When is a Forex Spam Site Not a Spam Site?

If you follow me on Twitter, you may have seen a conversation that I had with another website owner. If you don’t follow me, I just wanted to go through it really quick because there is a good lesson at the end of it.

OK, let me take a step back and start with an important piece of information about myself and how it lead to to this conversation. I hate EAs. Actually, I hate black box EAs.

These are automated trading systems that are supposed to double your money in two weeks or some version of that bullshit.  The trouble is that they are “black boxes” or you don’t know how the system trades.  If you don’t know what a system is doing, how can you trust it?

Don’t get me wrong, I think it is completely possible to create an automated trading program that works.  Fund managers do it all the time and Trading Hero Ed Seykota was a pioneer.  However, you need to be able to understand why the system is making money.  There may be a fundamental shift in the marketplace that invalidates your advantage you and you need to be able to adjust accordingly.

So just to clarify, I have no problem with an EA…as long as they give you the exact system they are trading.  If it is just a black box EA, then I think it is completely worthless.  In addition, I think that they are detrimental to the credibility of the retail Forex market.

I wholeheartedly believe that Forex is the best market in the world for the at-home trader.  But these black box EAs turn many beginners off to a tremendous opportunity.  When they buy these EAs, they think they are “trading” when in reality, they are effectively taking stock tips from their hairdresser.

Then they lose all their money and say that Forex sucks.  No it doesn’t, it absolutely rocks!

The Conversation

That’s the background, so let’s get to the Twitter conversation.  I posted the results of my Wallaby EURUSD backtesting on Twitter and got the following response:

OK, that is just this person’s opinion.  It just depends on how much money you are trading.  I think I can make a living off 19% of $10,000,000.  Don’t you?  But if I was only trading $50,000, that’s a different story.

That sounds like they are trying to sell me something.  But whatever…let’s see who this person is before I comment.  So I checked the website listed in the Twitter profile. The first thing I do is check the About page.  Here is what it says:

So what do you notice right away?  No real name of the owner, no published trading results and a few typos (like the kind outsourced English-as-a-second-language workers make).  Other scam sites are also mentioned, which is generally a false validation of the site that it is written on.  To me, these are usually signs of a spam site.  But maybe not…

Then I looked at the articles.  At the top of the list are a few reviews of EAs.  On top of that, there is a “Trading Systems Reviews” page that looks like this:

Again, not that well formatted and the rating system looks arbitrary.  In the internet marketing world, creating a “review site” is a classic way to provide a comparison between different products.  The site gives the visitors so many choices that the visitor forgets that they don’t have to choose any of them.

This is fine if the ratings are based on the opinion of the author or ratings that they got from users.  However, many times, random ratings are applied just to sell products.  So at this point, I was starting to form an opinion about this person.

Then I finally read a few of the articles.  I actually skimmed them like I do with most things online.  From what I skimmed, I decided that the website is just trying to hock EAs.  There were only a couple of months of testing results…not much evidence on the reviews that I saw that would justify the rating.  That is when I got pissed.

I get this from time to time…spammers trying to tell me that my trading sucks when all they are doing is selling a crappy EA.  I am happy to talk trading with any trader and answer any question from a beginner, no matter now elementary or misguided (in my opinion).  But when spammers try to tell me that my trading sucks or they spout off some overused trading maxim like: “you should have stayed in the trade because the trend is your friend,” then I have a low tolerance for that crap.

So I wrote back:

Generally, that shuts most spammers up.  But this person kept coming.  My favorite was:

Then after a few back and forths, I realized that this person may be the real deal. Especially after this:

Whoops, now who’s the asshole? This person could just be saying that of course, but the fact that he/she took the time out to answer my questions leads me to believe that they are telling the truth.

A Closer Look

So I went back to see if I could have been wrong.  I read the reviews more closely and in each one, there was one line that said something like:

In this case, it says that the trading system is “well explained.”  Other Tweets went on to explain things like:

And

And finally

Fair enough.  I apologized for being harsh and I think we are cool now.

The Lesson

So what did I learn from this?  The next time I check out a site, I will investigate it further before making a final decision.  This is something that you should keep in mind too, especially when the site looks really good.  Take a few minutes to chat with the owner of the site via email, Twitter, phone or whatever contact means available.  Find out what they are really about.

The site I am talking about is called GreatTradingSystems.com.  After I got over this initial setback, it is actually a cool site.  One great feature is that is has an indicator repository.  There are tons of free indicators for MT4, MT5 and Ninja Trader.  I’m not promoting indicatoritis, but if you are looking for something in particular, this is a great place to start.

Anyway, that is when a spam site is NOT a spam site.  When it is misunderstood! Thanks for staying with me.

Suggestions For Improvement

To the owner of GreatTradingSystems.com…here are a few things that I would recommend to make your site easier to understand and give people a reason to follow.  I am interested in the development of automated trading systems based on my backtesting and if you are trading them for a living, your site could be a great resource.

Strictly constructive criticism, of course.  If was turned off, it’s a good chance that others are too!

  • Write what you told me on Twitter on your homepage and about page.  The stuff about: you manually backtest and you don’t like black box EAs.
  • In each review, explicitly say that you are only reviewing this EA because it gives out the strategy it is trading.
  • Say that you trade for a living on your about page.
  • Consider creating a pen name for yourself.  Even if you call yourself “Mr. X”, that is way more believable than what you have now.
  • How about some Forex Tester indicators?
  • Maybe give some resources on how we can create our own EA based on a system we already trade…programmers, steps, etc.

Small things, but I think it would make a huge difference.  Good Luck!




If you enjoyed this article, you might also like:

  1. What is the Next Big Social Networking Site?


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I used to get a kick out of viewing systems on ebay and other locations on the internet and came to the conclusion that most automated systems (99%+) were fake.Even the ones that you believe to be real can be scams as well: http://www.pipcop.com/ Many systems only work with a specific set of brokers.In my travels with MT4 I found many ways to cheat EA results, both in forward and back testing.1.) There is a bug in iWPR which will allow you to open and close hundreds of thousands of trades over 10 years, most of which will open and close at the same price with profit. This is how those amazing scalper systems work. 2.) You can find brokers that have removed the spread from backtesting and scalpers work like a dream. 3.) You can record which trades didn't work in a high frequency trading system and run the system again, ignoring those trades. 4.) You can set up multiple systems on brokers that don't have spreads on demo and use server lag to get the best price to the systems that are a second behind. 5.) You can curve fit. I have generated trillions from the MT4 ST. I have generated so much money with hundreds of thousands of trades that the MT4 ST hung. 6.) One of the most popular sources of MT4 testing data has a quirk in it where the spread widens after 2006. It's not difficult to test with this data and then adjust the dates on the prices. Many people will just look at the ST report and the graph and fail to check the entries and exits. 7.) There is a bug in DDE integration where you can enter your own prices.I have seen all of these bugs in practice in implementing my own systems.I used to read many forums, trying to a find a decent system but quickly came to the realization that most of the information about FOREX systems is advertisement and noise, and after this I only read here: http://www.mql4.com/Here are some videos on my travels when I created profitable systems: http://www.youtube.com/user/arachnodenet#p/uMike

Great talking with you on Sunday Mike. I'm really impressed, you have really tested the boundaries of mechanical systems. I have always wondered how they managed to get those fantastic results when testing over longer time periods like 10 years. Now I understand. Thanks for the tips and resources, I'll check out your YouTube video this week!